Substantially-all-trade criterion
Substantially-all-trade criterion: Article XXIV of the GATT sets out the conditions under which customs unions and free-trade areas may be regarded as consistent with the Agreement. It requires that substantially all trade between the parties to a preferential agreement must be covered as part of qualifying under the rules. The GATT does not say how this is to be understood or calculated. Two schools of thought have emerged on what the criterion means. The first adopts a quantitative approach, and it defines "substantially all trade" in terms of the value of total trade. A broad assumption among WTO members has been that this should be about 80% to 90% of total trade. Under this approach, agriculture or other sensitive sectors might not be covered by an agreement, but the remainder of trade might be enough to satisfy the criterion. The second approach is qualitative. It says that all sectors must be covered, and that leaving out agriculture, for example, would automatically violate the criterion. Agreement on which school should prevail is not in sight, even though WTO members have agreed during the Uruguay Round that the contribution of a free-trade agreement to world trade would be diminished if any major sector of trade was excluded. Article V of the GATS, which covers free-trade agreements in services, also has a substantially-all-trade criterion. It is divided there into the need for substantial sectoral coverage of services and the absence or elimination of substantially all discrimination in terms of national treatment. "Substantial sectoral coverage" is to be understood in terms of number of sectors, volume of trade affected and modes of services delivery. Additionally, no mode of supply should be excluded a priori.
Source: http://ctrc.sice.oas.org/trc/WTO/Documents/Dictionary%20of%20trade%20%20policy%20terms.pdf
Web site to visit: http://ctrc.sice.oas.org
Author of the text: W. Goode
If you are the author of the text above and you not agree to share your knowledge for teaching, research, scholarship (for fair use as indicated in the United States copyrigh low) please send us an e-mail and we will remove your text quickly. Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use)
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
The following texts are the property of their respective authors and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to share for free to students, teachers and users of the Web their texts will used only for illustrative educational and scientific purposes only.
All the information in our site are given for nonprofit educational purposes
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
www.riassuntini.com